This is the P2PU Archive. If you want the current site, go to www.p2pu.org!
P2PU Lounge - Mar 2010
What is a P2PU Course?
The P2PU learning experience is based on interaction between peers in small communities.
-
The course organizer does not teach in the traditional sense. The course organizer functions as a study group faciliator, who keeps everything moving along, pulls people into the conversation, and makes sure all voices are heard.
-
Course members are encouraged to learn together, review each other's work and provide feedback instead of formal assessment.
-
Course groups are kept small to create a stronger sense of community, which provides additional support mechanisms, and motivates members to keep going.
All courses at P2PU are free and open.
-
Course organizers volunteer their time to create and run a course.
-
All course content must be freely available, and preferably open licenced.
P2PU courses evolve.
-
Once a course ends its content still available on the web through archives for anyone to see and use.
-
A new organizer can adopt and remix an old course.
Comments
Thanks for putting this up! >
Thanks for putting this up!
> Courses remain freely accessible out of session.
What does that mean? That all material and tools are available outside of group session/meetings, so anybody can commit and participate at any time?
This is a cross between
This is a cross between transcendentalist thinking, constructivist theory and within the framework of self efficacy. I wonder, however, how do you make the distinction between teach and facilitate. I acknowledge this must mean that P2PU courses are more student centered, of course, but what defines or classifies the action of facilitate?
I think as a minimum, it
I think as a minimum, it means that all the material generated by a course, such as submissions, discussion forum messages, maybe recordings of synchronous meetings etc, are viewable for all. Whether we should still allow people to post and edit etc, is something we haven't really thought through. We definitively want to keep the debates going, but whether that is best accomplished in the course itself, or by moving it out to a bigger sphere (maybe a "cyberpunk" lounge, where people from all the cyberpunk courses can discuss, maintain resources etc).
Stian,thank you for your
Stian,
thank you for your thoughtful and quick reply. I like the idea of synchronous teaching modalities as much research indicates that such blended models of asynchronous and synchrnous learning environments may lead to higher quality learning and lower attrition rates. I like the idea of being able to post and edit in undergraduate level courses, however, it may be more appropriate to remove the edit function in graduate level. Though in your about page and in related blogs the ideology is to rid the collectivist open learning system of certain hierarchies, graduate level courses make sense in my humble opinion.A student centered model is great, but as subject matters covered become more complex and easier to get wrong, we will need a more concrete applicable working definition of facilitators based on sound theory and empirically validated by your aforementioned experimentation.
Kind Regards,
Jacob Mack
Now, this is a generalization
Now, this is a generalization based upon my own expriences and the references I will leave at a later date, however, there is much reliability and validity to the claims I will soon make. Students who come from indigent backgrounds of considerable intelligence, IQ, ability to articulate, and motivation are not subject to be shaped and primed by the current societal group thinks and tribal mentality based upon evolutionary principles well understood in various branches of the sciences, both social and biological. Elitism is a very real mentality, an ideology of the very few. This relates to my posts here and to the greater structure of this site's purpose. "To learn freely." To share in a community and to grow as both individuals and as a whole. Educational theory and social learning based upon legitimate and empirically grounded practice, can lead to empowered groups made of great individuals bringing about positive social change for those less fortunate. This is far more difficult to really do than people tell themselves. Actions have consequences both positive and negative,but the former and the latter to whom? Some people benefit while others do not from any series of actions. It is naive to apply purely utilitarian philosophy or deontological for that matter either, however, we must start with some agreed upon convention, assuming we have similar goals in the first place. I would love to teach illiterate people how to read and write and help those who cannot understand Algebra do so and if given that opportunity here or elsewhere related to teach or tutor I would take it. In my own life I help poor people learn as I know what it means to be poor in my past as well. For who do I teach, for who do you teach, and finally, for what do I, or teach? We have here a connectivist perspective and a constructivist underpinning, so what motivates us? For what do we live for?
Recently, I had the opportunity to go to Palo Alto and visit the Stanford University campus. I walked into one of their libraries, so awestruck the name of this one out of 25 libs on campus eludes me at the moment in my early morning posting; however, suffice to say the library was so impressive. Anything I wanted to research, anything at all I could look up and come to know with just motivation, sufficient procedural methods and a little intelligence. Facts must be faced, it is money that brings about these ivory tower typologies... When I first walked in and I saw that I needed an ID to get into this castle of a library, I walked out with a mild panic attack. Why should I be so anxious? I believed without asking that I would not be allowed in as I had been taught, this place was too good for me; off limits. I thought these people were better than me. I walked out and told a lie to my friend a taxi cab driver who had taken me out there, a homeless independent owner and operator of a cab. I told him I had asked if I could go inside, and was denied. My friend walked into the Library, and a minute later came back out and yelled at me: "you liar!" They will let you sign in your information in a computer and get a free pass. I will digress for now, but I want us all to ponder a little more our motivations and those pesky self fulfilling prophecies.
Kind Regards,
Jacob Mack
References
Buckley C.,Pitt E., Norton B., & Owens T.(2010). Stuents' approaches to study, conceptions of learning
and judgements about the value of networked technologies.Active Learning in Education.
Also:
http://cider.athabascau.ca/CIDERSessions/groulet/On%20Being%20Too%20Nice...
I am becoming educated and
I am becoming educated and more than familiar with wikieducator. This is very interesting to me and in need of further research and development. My only concern really is quality control for accuracy and readability. Wikipedia suffers greatly from lack of quality control. The Nature analysis from a few years ago indicating that Wikipedia was about as accurate as the superior Britannica turned out to have qualitative and statistical flaws leading to an incorrect conclusion. Having said that wikieducator has the potential to change the way learning is activated and where and to whom.
http://wikieducator.org/Wikieducator_Tutorials
I believe Alison means that
I believe Alison means that if you are a course participant and miss a live seminar, you should be able to access a recording to catch up.
And that all course
And that all course materials, including the discussion between participants remains publicly available for others to view. We are not 100% sure on what happens after a course closes - in terms of allowing participants to post more content. Ideally each course would grow into a community of graduates who stay connected in some way, but it's not clear that this will happen always.
Cool.
Cool.
Cool.
I am just getting acquainted with the system and engaging in some good communication. Thank you for your reply.
Comments in-line: *
Comments in-line:
* Course members are encouraged to learn together, review each other's work and provide feedback instead of formal assessment.
--This might change with the accreditation models and partnerships we are exploring, no?
* Course groups are kept small to create a stronger sense of community, which provides additional support mechanisms, and motivates members to keep going.
- I thought the Portuguese courses were 100+? How do they fit in?
* All course content must be freely available, and preferably open licenced.
- might want to revise to "must" to "is".
Iam 19 what are they teaching
Iam 19 what are they teaching here can somebody help me.Whats my work ,where is the material
I've moved this page to the
I've moved this page to the wiki, where we can all edit together:
http://wiki.p2pu.org/P2PU-Courses