P2PU Archive - General discussion

Weekly reviews of other groups' submissions

David Davies — Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:04:01 +0000

This activity for us makes most sense in context of the original submission, so we have not compiled a separate document of these reviews. All our comments are on the submission pages for each group - although we've tended to concentrate on the Australian groups as there's only 2 of us in the Lime group. We also felt that reviews made in this way stimulate discussion.

What do others think?

Blue Group Discussion-Week 2

Karen Konrath — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:12:47 +0000

Help! How can our group 'get together'?

Kit Keller — Sat, 27 Mar 2010 16:11:48 +0000

Hi all,

I've received many messages about the first assignment...unfortunately, many are not from the group I'm assigned to, which is the the Blue Group. And for those that are from members of the Blue Group, I don't see their posting in our Week One discussion section. Where are these postings being made? I don't see them on the P2P Wiki either. Can we have the emails for group members? That might be our best option.

Kit Keller
Blue Group

Aqua- group discusson 1

Leonie Whiting — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:45:20 +0000

Questions (to be answered by each group)

Which of the above material is protected by copyright and under what category of work or other subject matter?

There are a number of issues that I can see with this scenario – it’s the “lack” of information that is provides to use (the assessors). Here are my issues

Extracts from Charles Darwin's personal diaries and notebooks

Are these personal diaries and notebooks published and if so when were they published, and how much was used (more then 10%)

Aqua Group ( Australia)

Trudi Hamilton — Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:07:09 +0000

Aqua Group ( Australia)

Pauline Crawford,Leonie Whiting, Trudi Hamilton and Lisa Nash