This is the P2PU Archive. If you want the current site, go to www.p2pu.org!

Copyright for Educators, Cycle 2 - Mar 2010

Course Material

Pink Group Discussion Space Week 3

Delia Browne's picture
Mon, 2010-03-08 08:07

Comments

Week 3 Scenario

Erik Wallen's picture
Erik Wallen
Tue, 2010-04-06 19:26

Here's the link to the wiki: Link to the wiki:
http://archive.p2pu.org/Copyright-for-Educators-Pink-Group-Wiki-Space

and this week's scenario:

Case Scenario 3

Francesca is a teacher at a under resourced school. The school has limited access to textbooks but recently the school has been generously donated 2 smart boards and 10 DVD players by a successful ex pupil.

She often

makes photocopies of chapters of text book to hand out to her class
downloads images from the interent to put on a smart board to present to her classes.
copies music from her own CDs to include in PowerPoint presentations to her class
makes her own resources such as a compilation of short film clips copied from DVDs and copy television broadcasts to assist in her teaching.

She is not sure whether she is allowed to do any of the above under the Copyright Law and is concerned that she may be breaking the law.

Questions (to be answered by each group)

In your jurisdiction is she permitted to make multiple photocopies of a chapter of a textbook and in what circumstances? Consider any exceptions, compulsory or blanket licence schemes that may apply?
Is she allowed to download and copy images from the internet to present on an interactive smartboard to her class?
Is she allowed to include copy music recordings in her powerpoint presentations to her class?
Can she make a compilation of short extracts from dvds of films and/or copy broadcasts from television to teach her class?
Is she permitted to circumvent any technological protection measures attached to the DVD films?

Question to assist your understanding (not to be answered)

What is a copyright licence?
What is a blanket licence and/or or compulsory licence?
What is a technological protection measure?
Is there a law against anti circumvention in your jurisdiction? If so what educational activities might it prevent?

Erik's thoughts on the week 3 scenario

Erik Wallen's picture
Erik Wallen
Wed, 2010-04-07 21:32

Wow, my hopes had been soaring after our week one and two readings, which taught me that there were many more ways to use copyrighted materials than I had known previously. This week's readings though, brought me firmly back down to earth with guidelines about counting the number of words being used and making sure that the use is spontaneous and brief.

In what we've read so far, there seems to be a big difference between what students can do with copyrighted materials, and what instructors can do.

Anyway, here are my initial thoughts about this week's questions:

1. In your jurisdiction is she permitted to make multiple photocopies of a chapter of a textbook and in what circumstances? Consider any exceptions, compulsory or blanket licence schemes that may apply?

It seems that this is a violation of copyright, because she is reproducing a large amount of a work instead of purchasing it. This would seem to be a violation of rule #4, which says that the copying should not affect the potential market for the product. It also seems to violate rule #3, which limits the amount that can be used, in relation to the whole.

Also, this copying does not seem to fit the definitions of “Brevity” or “Spontaneity” as they’re described in this week’s readings.

An exception can be made for single copies of book chapters for the teacher. Any use would have to show the copyright.

2. Is she allowed to download and copy images from the internet to present on an interactive smartboard to her class?

It seems like this could be a fair use. If we look at the 4 factors, it would seem that many uses of individual pictures would be ok to use. These kinds of uses would be for non-commercial purposes and would likely not affect the market for these products. She would have to indicate that the work is copyrighted.

But, how does one determine the portion of the copyrighted work being used if it’s taken from a web page?

This use does, however, seem to violate the brevity and spontaneity guidelines.

3. Is she allowed to include copy music recordings in her powerpoint presentations to her class?

This use also seems to be a fair use. The Guideline from today’s reading (p. 8) say that a single copy of a sound recording can be made and used. She would probably have to indicate that it is copyrighted.

It would also seem that this use would fall into fair use if we do a 4 factor test. In fact, in my opinion, playing music like this often acts like advertising and increases its market value.

4. Can she make a compilation of short extracts from dvds of films and/or copy broadcasts from television to teach her class?

Again, my own feeling is that this would be a fair use, mostly because she is working in a non-profit capacity and the fact that the use is not likely to affect the market for these prodicts.

Possible considerations:
• How much is she using?
• Did she create this to replace a commercially available compilation?

One other thought – does transformative use figure into this? (maybe transformative use isn't a considerations when instructors use materials?)

5. Is she permitted to circumvent any technological protection measures attached to the DVD films?

Very interesting question. My own thought would be that because most technological protection measures come as the result of accepting some kind of usage terms from the provider, that she would not be able to circumvent these.

1. It seems that this is a

Amy Bauer's picture
Amy Bauer
Thu, 2010-04-08 16:28

1. It seems that this is a violation of copyright, because she is reproducing a large amount of a work instead of purchasing it. This would seem to be a violation of rule #4 (agree with this because of the amount of work she wants to use), which says that the copying should not affect the potential market for the product. It also seems to violate rule #3, which limits the amount that can be used, in relation to the whole.

Also, this copying does not seem to fit the definitions of “Brevity” or “Spontaneity” as they’re described in this week’s readings. - I agree with this.

An exception can be made for single copies of book chapters for the teacher. Any use would have to show the copyright. - They should always show the copyright.

2. Is she allowed to download and copy images from the internet to present on an interactive smartboard to her class?

It seems like this could be a fair use. If we look at the 4 factors, it would seem that many uses of individual pictures would be ok to use. These kinds of uses would be for non-commercial purposes and would likely not affect the market for these products. She would have to indicate that the work is copyrighted.

But, how does one determine the portion of the copyrighted work being used if it’s taken from a web page? - Excellent question. Would also be a matter of authors. Is the whole web page copyrighted by one or multiple people/groups.

This use does, however, seem to violate the brevity and spontaneity guidelines. - completely agree

3. Is she allowed to include copy music recordings in her powerpoint presentations to her class?

This use also seems to be a fair use. The Guideline from today’s reading (p. 8) say that a single copy of a sound recording can be made and used. She would probably have to indicate that it is copyrighted. - Agree because she purchased the cds she is using music from.

It would also seem that this use would fall into fair use if we do a 4 factor test. In fact, in my opinion, playing music like this often acts like advertising and increases its market value.

4. Can she make a compilation of short extracts from dvds of films and/or copy broadcasts from television to teach her class?

Again, my own feeling is that this would be a fair use, mostly because she is working in a non-profit capacity and the fact that the use is not likely to affect the market for these prodicts.

Possible considerations:
• How much is she using? - no more than 10% of each piece.
• Did she create this to replace a commercially available compilation? - good question. What access to commericially available work does she have?

One other thought – does transformative use figure into this? (maybe transformative use isn't a considerations when instructors use materials?)

5. Is she permitted to circumvent any technological protection measures attached to the DVD films?

Very interesting question. My own thought would be that because most technological protection measures come as the result of accepting some kind of usage terms from the provider, that she would not be legally able to circumvent these. DRM is "designed to stop unauthorised copying of digital material." (Hoffman, Introducing Copyright, p.112)

Welcome Amy

Erik Wallen's picture
Erik Wallen
Thu, 2010-04-08 16:49

Welcome to the group Amy, I'm glad you're here. You and I may be the only active people in the group right now.

Thanks Erik. At least I am

Amy Bauer's picture
Amy Bauer
Thu, 2010-04-08 17:46

Thanks Erik. At least I am not alone this time! I hope my few additions are helpful. Thanks for doing so much work. I am working full time and taking grad classes (as well as other things) so I cannot devote too much time to this, but I do what I can. It is a great subject and I am learning an amazing amount of information here.

Sound like you're busy, I'll

Erik Wallen's picture
Erik Wallen
Fri, 2010-04-09 23:21

Sound like you're busy, I'll put what we have on the wiki this evening and we can tweek it until we think it's ready to go.

I'll be travelling for work much of next week so I'm going to try to get an early start on the next assignment but if you don't hear from me for a few days, don't worry, I should be able to get back on by the end of next week.

That works for me.

Amy Bauer's picture
Amy Bauer
Sat, 2010-04-10 00:22

That works for me.

week 3 answers

Kenneth Ronkowitz's picture
Kenneth Ronkowitz
Sun, 2010-04-11 16:43

I was busy this past week, but have added my responses for 3 to the wiki
http://archive.p2pu.org/Copyright-for-Educators-Pink-Group-Wiki-Space

since much of this relies on Fair Use, you might find these useful
http://librarycopyright.net/digitalslider/
http://blog.lib.umn.edu/copyinfo/scenarios/023136.html specific to this scenario
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

Hi Ken, I was right behind

Amy Bauer's picture
Amy Bauer
Sun, 2010-04-11 17:00

Hi Ken, I was right behind you on the wiki. I entered Erik and my answers to yours. Thanks for the links I will look at them.

submission of answers

Kenneth Ronkowitz's picture
Kenneth Ronkowitz
Mon, 2010-04-12 02:43

who is up to submit? Amy?

I still have a poor sense of who in our group is active.

I can submit this week. I am

Amy Bauer's picture
Amy Bauer
Mon, 2010-04-12 04:59

I can submit this week. I am in NJ, so I would be submitting this very soon.

I submitted our answers as a word doc.

NJ

Kenneth Ronkowitz's picture
Kenneth Ronkowitz
Mon, 2010-04-12 18:50

I am also in NJ! Small world.

Hi Ken, NJ yes it is a small

Amy Bauer's picture
Amy Bauer
Mon, 2010-04-12 19:48

Hi Ken, NJ yes it is a small world. I believe we have a mutual acquaintance. Chris Shamburg is a professor of mine at NJCU. He mentioned your name in an email we had about P2PU. I said you weren't in my group, but now you are! Funny thing is I have never met either of you in person. Small cyber world.

I had some difficulties with my online connection last night, but I got the assignment submitted before midnight. Everything should be well. I never critiqued the other group answers (my original group didn't get around to that) so how should we handle that part? Who should we pick? I will look at the wiki to see what this group has done before.