This is the P2PU Archive. If you want the current site, go to www.p2pu.org!

Open Journalism & the Open Web

My recent threads

You haven't posted any discussions yet.

Recently updated threads

Google's irony: supporting open source, monopolize the advertising marketing. Can journalism live in that model?

Go back to: General discussion

Google's irony: There is something that make noise in my head since a while... Let me put in this way: Since the beginning of the Internet, two forces appear to discuss the status quo at the net: on the one hand, large corporations and some states they seek to keep the Internet standard, and on the other, other corporations, organizations and users - and even some states - who claim that the standard should rest open and neutral. The big irony is that Google is staying with the status quo of the internet using the two forces simultaneously: while keeping their algorithms closed, keeps the global business of advertising, attacks the privacy of individuals as never before happened in the history of mankind and is abandoning Internet neutrality, commit to hacker's culture the spirit of open source for web applications such as for mobile phones and convince thousands of developers that open source is the solution of the future and that "Sharing is good." As a journalist, who works in a graphic medium that thrives on publicity, there also is ironic that we live by, for and with Google - a tool that seems fundamental to journalism - though this might be a serious problem in the future (well, it's already happening) . Internet needs of the newsmedia and hackers to keep alert, and open paths where others want to close them. But, the thing is: can journalist live (pay the bill, buy food, etc) in this busines model?

nancy cardozo's picture
nancy cardozo
Fri, 2010-09-24 18:05

At this moment there is great excitement over the idea that everyone can easily access almost any type of data. I think that excitement will fade somewhat when people realize that data is like a pile of flour. It doesn't do you much good unless someone who knows what they are doing uses it in the right way. The format will change, the delivery system will change, but journalists--people who extract meaning from data and explain that meaning in ways that regular people can understand--will always be needed. The idea that the data we collect can be extracted, organized, and sold in some form to provide money to pay journalists is very appealing. This may be our salvation.

The real open source movement seems to be building an alternative to Google so that if and when they really do turn 'evil' there will be enough alternatives to their products.