This is the P2PU Archive. If you want the current site, go to www.p2pu.org!

Managing Election Campaigns

My recent threads

You haven't posted any discussions yet.

Recently updated threads

Concluding the class

Go back to: General discussion

This was originally intended to be a six-week class. However, we've had new people join us along the way and the perspectives they have brought have been very valuable. I am really pleased that there was such an international group for this conversation.

I'd like to offer you the opportunity to try to develop the ideas we've talked about by developing a sample campaign strategic plan that answers the following questions:

1. How will the candidate's biography interact with the campaign - media, budget, etc...?
2. Who are your target voters? How many do you need (percentage of registrants/absolute numbers) to win? What is your target for voter identification? (How many voters will prior to election day commit to supporting your candidate?
3. How will you contact voters? (door-to-door, phone, mail, internet) For each mechanism, how many votes will you yield toward voter identification?
4. How much money do you need for your effort? (Staff, phone bills, campaign headquarters, mail, printing, house signs, volunteer support, food, cost of fundraisers)? How will you raise that money? (house parties, family, friends, website, organizational endorsements, etc...)
5. How will you get volunteers (phone, house parties, oganizational endorsements)? How will you use volunteers for maxiumum effectiveness (voter contact, GOTV). What is your schedule for voter activity between now and election day?

Then, think about the ethical issues we've raised?

1. What are your long-term vs. short-term goals? Do your short-term goals (getting a single candidate elected) conflict with your long-term goals (issues, better citizenship)?
2. Does the tactic of voter identification conflict with the goal of universal involvement, eg. ignoring unlikely voters)?

Then, think about the international dimension?

1. How do elections and the rules under which elections are fought reflect the goals of democracy?
2. Is obligatory voting better than voluntary voting?
3. Do some countries have stronger democracies because there is a smaller ethnic component to voting? 

And, as always, add your own questions to these. Let's try to wrap up the formal class by this coming weekend (unless I hear otherwise). And thanks to everyone.

marwan al-sibai's picture
marwan al-sibai
Tue, 2010-10-26 14:14

why in the usa they dont change the election rules?

Tété Enyon Guemadji-Gbedemah's picture
Tété Enyon Guemad...
Tue, 2010-10-26 14:45

This experience is my first one and it was very exciting. Even at the end of the class, I'll refer to the materials.

A democratic election suppose all candidates accept they will be elected by voters they need to convince in the right way. On an ethical level, if a candidate has more resources than others and may invest them to buy votes, the game is flawed.

More seriously, all the questions listed above are pertinent in the management of elections campaings and request an answer. After that comes time management, let's say the planning.

Larry Cooperman's picture
Larry Cooperman
Sun, 2010-10-31 03:53

Thanks for the kind words. I will be offering the class again, possibly as early as January 2011, and invite all of you to continue with me. I hope to keep improving the course with your help, so any comments are greatly appreciated.

By way of ritual apology, I had a very heavy travel schedule during this class and that cut into my responsiveness.

Just as one comment about why we have such election rules that cut across truly democratic goals in the US. I think we are like all countries and there is always a heavy investment by powerful sectors in keeping things the way they are. I offer this course because regardless of the obstacles, I believe in democratic participation.

Claudia Porzio's picture
Claudia Porzio
Tue, 2010-11-09 10:08

Thank you very much: this experience was very useful.
Now, i'm trying to transform this experience for the Italian reality.

Larry Cooperman's picture
Larry Cooperman
Tue, 2010-11-23 00:37

Please let me know how it goes!

Mary Louise Harp's picture
Mary Louise Harp
Mon, 2010-11-22 17:27

Hello Larry, As a reporter, I do not have the knowledge to see the good, the bad, the ugly of the left over campaign monies. Do you know how to read the left over campaign contributions?

Larry Cooperman's picture
Larry Cooperman
Tue, 2010-11-23 00:49

I guess the best way to think about it is what would happen in the absence of leftover campaign funds. The laws around this are different in virtually every state of the US, much less globally. But, in general, only incumbents and the rare challenger will have leftover funds. An unsuccessful challenger who doesn't spend available funds is a bad candidate or has a bad campaign manager. Most challengers overestimate their fundraising capabilities and end up in debt, usually to themselves.

Part of carrying over funds is the idea that you could, after the campaign is over, raise money to cover a debt. In fact, successful candidates are able to do this and unsuccessful candidates are not. This takes us down the road of the expectations of donors when their candidate does win and is a whole topic in and of itself.

Hope this helps.